Linguistic approaches and modern communication technologies in political discourses in Europe and the USA (contrastive aspect)
Palabras clave:
discurso político, comunicación política, tecnologías de la comunicación, enfoques lingüísticos, política comparada
Resumen
En este estudio, analizamos el discurso político de Estados Unidos y Europa en términos de enfoques lingüísticos. Entre los métodos que utilizamos se encuentran el sistémico, estructural, funcional, análisis de contenido, análisis del discurso y método de tesauro. Su aplicación tuvo lugar dentro de la teoría del discurso. El estudio encontró que la principal diferencia entre los discursos políticos de Europa y Estados Unidos son las formas y medios de comunicación, los formatos de su distribución y los indicadores masivos de inclusión de la población (receptora del discurso político) en la interacción comunicativa. La diferencia es también la centralización y los niveles en los que se desarrolla el discurso. Por ejemplo, el enfoque de la retórica política en la institución de la presidencia de Estados Unidos hace que el discurso presidencial sea un reflejo de la opinión pública. Esto no es típico de los países europeos, ya que el pluralismo de opinión está muy extendido allí, la comunicación tiene lugar a nivel local, regional, nacional y supranacional. Además, la identidad europea está en proceso de formación. Sin embargo, ambos discursos tienen en común el compromiso con los valores de la democracia, pero se manifiestan de manera diferente.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
AKINCHYTS, Nazar. 2007. “Political discourse as an object of scientific analysis” In: Problems of modern linguistics. No. 1, pp. 72-26. Available online. In: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/ handle/123456789/54472/19kinchits.pdf?sequence=1. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
ANANKO, Tetiana. 2021. “Persuasion strategies in Joe Biden’s political discourse” In: Bulletin of the KNLU. Series: Philology. Vol 24, No. 1, pp. 9-15. Available online. In: http://philmessenger.knlu.edu.ua/article/ view/235921. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
ARBELÁEZ-CAMPILLO, Diego; TATSIY Vasyl; ROJAS-BAHAMÓN, Magda; DANILYAN, Oleg. 2020. “Contributions of Critical Thinking as a Form of Participation and Political Deliberation” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 27, pp. 5-12. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.34069/ AI/2020.27.03.1. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
ARUTYUNOVA, Nataliia. 1990. Discourse. In Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Soviet Encyclopedia. Moscow, Russia.
AVERINTSEV, Serhii. 1996. Rhetoric and origins of the European literary tradition. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture. Available online. In: http://predanie.clients-dnnow.ru/uploads/ftp/averincev-sergey-ser/ritorika-i-istoki-evropeyskoy-literaturnoy-tradi/ritorika-i-istoki- ievropieiskoi-litierat-avierintsiev.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
BENVENISTE, Emile. 1966. “Problèmes de linguistique générale” In: Les Etudes Philosophiques. Vol 21, No. 3, pp. 105-107. Available online. In: https://www.persee.fr/doc/lfr_0023-8368_1969_num_1_1_5409. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
BENVENISTE, Emile. 1971. “Subjectivity in language. Problems in general linguistics” In: Journal de psychologie. No. 1, pp. 223-230. Available online. In: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/294097/ mod_resource/content/1/Benveniste%20(1).pdf. Date of consultation: 14/10/2020.
BERGER, Peter L; LUCKMANN, Thomas. 1967. The social construction of reality. Anchor Books. London. Available online. In: http://www. perflensburg.se/Berger%20social-construction-of-reality.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/10/2020.
BIDEN, Joseph. 2021. Inaugural Address by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House. Available online. In: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by- president-joseph-r-biden-jr/. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
BOUVIER, Gwen. 2015. “What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: connecting with other academic fields?” In: Journal of Multicultural Discourses. Vol 10, No. 2, pp. 149- 162. Available online. In: Doi: 10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
DREHER, Jochen. 2016. “The social construction of power: Reflections beyond Berger/Luckmann and Bourdieu” In: Cultural Sociology. Vol 10. No. 1, pp. 53-68. Available online. In: http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/32550/Dreher_0-316434.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=n. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
ENLI,GunSara;SKOGERBØ,Eli.2013.“Personalizedcampaignsinparty-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication” In: Information, Communication & Society. Vol 16, No. 5, pp. 757-774. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. Longman. London. Available online. In: https://www.felsemiotica.com/descargas/ Fairclough-Norman-Critical-Discourse-Analysis.-The-Critical-Study-of- Language.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
FOMENKO, Olena Stepanovna. 1998. Linguistic analysis of modern US political discourse (90s of XX century). Doctoral thesis. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv. Available online. In: http://library. nuft.edu.ua/ebook/file/10.02.04fomenkoS.pdf. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
HWANG, Sungwook. 2013. “The effect of Twitter uses on politicians’ credibility and attitudes toward politicians” In: Journal of Public Relations Research. Vol 25, No. 3, pp. 246-258. Available online. In: https://www. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1062726X.2013.788445. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KASIYAN, Anna Vadimivna. 2014. Speech etiquette in modern French socio- political discourse: linguocognitive and communicative-pragmatic aspects. Doctoral thesis. Kyiv National Linguistic University. Kyiv. Available online. In: http://www.disslib.org/movlennyevyi-etyket- u-suchasnomu-frantsuzkomu-suspilno-politychnomu-dyskursi.html. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KONDRATENKO, Natalia. 2007. Ukrainian political discourse: textualization of reality. Black Sea. Odessa. Available online. In: https://www.twirpx. com/file/2052919/. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KOVALEVA, Olena. 2020. “Political discourse: modern linguistic interpretations” In: Current issues of the humanities. Vol 27, No. 2, pp. 101-107. Available online. In: http://www.aphn-journal.in.ua/ archive/27_2020/part_2/16.pdf. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KRUIKEMEIER, Sanne. 2014. How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. In: Computers in Human Behavior. Vol 34, pp. 131-139. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KRYVYI, Anatolii. 2001. Discourse analysis and modern linguistics. In the Discourse of Foreign Language Communication. LNU named after I. Franko. Lviv, Ukraine.
LECONTE, Cécile. 2010. Understanding euroscepticism. Red Globe Press. Macmillan. Available online. In: https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/ detail/Understanding-Euroscepticism/?K=9780230228078. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MASALOVA, Maria. 2021. “Rhetorical persuasive strategies in Joe Biden’s inaugural address: A critical discourse analysis” In: The Scientific Heritage. Vol 67, No. 4, pp. 65-70.
MASLOVA, Valentina A. 2008. Cognitive linguistics. Minsk: Tetra Systems. Available online. In: https://platona.net/load/knigi_ po_filosofii/kognitivnye_nauki/maslova_v_a_kognitivnaja_ lingvistika_2008/17-1-0-1466. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MASROOR, Farzana; KHAN, Qintarah. N; AIB, Iman; ALI, Zulfiqar. 2019. “Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians” In: Social media + Society. Vol 5, No. 4, pp. 1-4. Available online. In: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MORRIS, Stephen. 2001. Political correctness. In: Journal of Political Economy. Vol 109, No. 2, pp. 231-265. Available online. In: https://www.haverford.edu/sites/default/files/Morris2001.pdf. Date of consultation:10/12/2020.
MUSOLFF, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available online. In: https://www.palgrave.com/gp/ book/9781403933898. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
OZADOVSKA, Liydmyla. 2004. “Language in the context of dialogue” In: Philosophical Thought. No. 3, pp. 22-50.
PAVLUTSKA, Vladyslava. 2008. “Political discourse: features and functions” In: Bulletin of ZhSU named after I. Franko. No. 39, pp. 218-221. Available online. In: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/2446/1/218-221.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
PROCTOR, Katarzyna; I-WENSU1, Lily. 2011. “The 1st person plural in political discourse – American politicians in interviews and in a debate” In: Journal of Pragmatics. Vol 43, No. 13, pp. 3251-3266. Available online. In: Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
PROTSENKO, Vitaly. November 11, 2018. “Anthology of populism: the real cause of people’s love and an effective weapon against Ukrainian populists” In: Voxukraine. Available online. In: https://voxukraine.org/ longreads/populism/index.html. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
RAHAYU, Ni Luh Putri; SUASTINI, Ni Wayan; JAYANTINI, I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa. 2021. “Political Discourse Structure on Joe Biden’s Acceptance Speech” In: International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics. Vol 1, No. 2, pp. 69-87.
REYES, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 22, No. 6, pp. 781-807. Available online. In: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.861.2997&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SARANI, Saeid; DEHSHIRI, Mohammad. 2019. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the American Dream and the China Dream” In: Amazonia Investiga. No. 8, Vol. 23, pp. 12-22. Available online. In: https:// amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/855. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SCHNEIKER, Andrea. 2019. “Telling the story of the superhero and the anti- politician as president: Donald Trump’s branding on Twitter” In: Political Studies Review. Vol 17, No. 3, pp. 210-223. Available online. In: https:// doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807712. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SERAZHIM, Kateryna. 2002. Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: methodology, architectonics, variability. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. ISBN 966 -594-180-1. Available online. In: https://www.twirpx.com/file/242668/. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SHARAPANOVSKA, Yuliia. 2016. “Theoretical foundations of political discourse analysis” In: Young Scholar. Vol. 4, No. 31, pp. 428-431.
SHCHOLOKOVA, Anna Vladimirovna. 2014. Features of the EU political discourse. Available online. In: https://bit.ly/3jCDuxe. Date of consultation: 14/07/2020.
SHEIGAL, Elena Iosifovna. 2000. “Semiotics of political discourse” In: Volgograd: Premena. Available online. In: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/2001-02-010-sheygal-e-i-semiotika-politicheskogo-diskursa- in-t-yazykoznaniya-ran-volgogr-gos-ped-un-t-volgograd-peremena- 2000-368-s-bibliogr-s. Date of consultation: 14/07/2020.
SHEIGAL, Elena Iosifovna. 2004. Semiotics of political discourse. Gnosis.Moscow, Russia.
SIREGAR, Try. 2021. “The critical discourse analysis on Joe Biden’s elected president speech” In: Journal of Applied Studies in Language. Vol 5, No. 1, pp. 79-86. Available online. In: http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL/ article/download/2298/1747/. Date of consultation: 14/05/2021.
SLAVOVA, Liydmyla. 2012. Linguistic personality of the leader in the mirror of political linguistic personology: USA – Ukraine. Zhytomyr: ZhSU named after I. Franko. Kiev, Ukraine.
SMOLYAKOV, Vladimir Alexandrovich. 2010. “Political dimension of economic integration (comparison of European and East Asian models)” In: Bulletin of KSAEP. Vol 3, No. 48, pp. 23-35. Available online. In: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/politicheskoe-izmerenie-ekonomicheskoy- integratsii-sravnenie-evropeyskoy-i-vostochnoaziatskoy-modeley. Date of consultation: 14/05/2021.
STREZHNEVA, Marina Vadimovna. 2005. “Integration and engagement as tools for global governance” In: International Processes. Vol 3, No. 1, pp. 17-28. Available online. In: https://mgimo.ru/library/ publications/113529/. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1993. “Principles of critical discourse analysis” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 4, No. 2, pp. 249-283. Available online. In: https://doi.or g/10.1177/0957926593004002006. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1997. “What is political discourse analysis?” In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Vol 11, No. 1, pp. 11-52. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1998. “Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach” In: SAGE. Available online. In: https://sk.sagepub.com/books/ideology. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 2006a. “Discourse and manipulation” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 17, No. 2, pp. 359-383.
VAN DIJK, Teun. A. 2006b. “Politics, ideology, and discourse. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics” In: Elsevier. Available online. In: https:// doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VASHCHUK, Tetiana. 2007. “Political discourse as an object of linguistic research” In: Bulletin of ZhSU named after I. Franko. No. 33, pp. 182- 185.
ANANKO, Tetiana. 2021. “Persuasion strategies in Joe Biden’s political discourse” In: Bulletin of the KNLU. Series: Philology. Vol 24, No. 1, pp. 9-15. Available online. In: http://philmessenger.knlu.edu.ua/article/ view/235921. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
ARBELÁEZ-CAMPILLO, Diego; TATSIY Vasyl; ROJAS-BAHAMÓN, Magda; DANILYAN, Oleg. 2020. “Contributions of Critical Thinking as a Form of Participation and Political Deliberation” In: Amazonia Investiga. Vol. 9, No. 27, pp. 5-12. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.34069/ AI/2020.27.03.1. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
ARUTYUNOVA, Nataliia. 1990. Discourse. In Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Soviet Encyclopedia. Moscow, Russia.
AVERINTSEV, Serhii. 1996. Rhetoric and origins of the European literary tradition. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture. Available online. In: http://predanie.clients-dnnow.ru/uploads/ftp/averincev-sergey-ser/ritorika-i-istoki-evropeyskoy-literaturnoy-tradi/ritorika-i-istoki- ievropieiskoi-litierat-avierintsiev.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
BENVENISTE, Emile. 1966. “Problèmes de linguistique générale” In: Les Etudes Philosophiques. Vol 21, No. 3, pp. 105-107. Available online. In: https://www.persee.fr/doc/lfr_0023-8368_1969_num_1_1_5409. Date of consultation: 14/08/2020.
BENVENISTE, Emile. 1971. “Subjectivity in language. Problems in general linguistics” In: Journal de psychologie. No. 1, pp. 223-230. Available online. In: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/294097/ mod_resource/content/1/Benveniste%20(1).pdf. Date of consultation: 14/10/2020.
BERGER, Peter L; LUCKMANN, Thomas. 1967. The social construction of reality. Anchor Books. London. Available online. In: http://www. perflensburg.se/Berger%20social-construction-of-reality.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/10/2020.
BIDEN, Joseph. 2021. Inaugural Address by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House. Available online. In: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by- president-joseph-r-biden-jr/. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
BOUVIER, Gwen. 2015. “What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: connecting with other academic fields?” In: Journal of Multicultural Discourses. Vol 10, No. 2, pp. 149- 162. Available online. In: Doi: 10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
DREHER, Jochen. 2016. “The social construction of power: Reflections beyond Berger/Luckmann and Bourdieu” In: Cultural Sociology. Vol 10. No. 1, pp. 53-68. Available online. In: http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/32550/Dreher_0-316434.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=n. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
ENLI,GunSara;SKOGERBØ,Eli.2013.“Personalizedcampaignsinparty-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication” In: Information, Communication & Society. Vol 16, No. 5, pp. 757-774. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. Longman. London. Available online. In: https://www.felsemiotica.com/descargas/ Fairclough-Norman-Critical-Discourse-Analysis.-The-Critical-Study-of- Language.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/02/2021.
FOMENKO, Olena Stepanovna. 1998. Linguistic analysis of modern US political discourse (90s of XX century). Doctoral thesis. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kyiv. Available online. In: http://library. nuft.edu.ua/ebook/file/10.02.04fomenkoS.pdf. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
HWANG, Sungwook. 2013. “The effect of Twitter uses on politicians’ credibility and attitudes toward politicians” In: Journal of Public Relations Research. Vol 25, No. 3, pp. 246-258. Available online. In: https://www. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1062726X.2013.788445. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KASIYAN, Anna Vadimivna. 2014. Speech etiquette in modern French socio- political discourse: linguocognitive and communicative-pragmatic aspects. Doctoral thesis. Kyiv National Linguistic University. Kyiv. Available online. In: http://www.disslib.org/movlennyevyi-etyket- u-suchasnomu-frantsuzkomu-suspilno-politychnomu-dyskursi.html. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KONDRATENKO, Natalia. 2007. Ukrainian political discourse: textualization of reality. Black Sea. Odessa. Available online. In: https://www.twirpx. com/file/2052919/. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KOVALEVA, Olena. 2020. “Political discourse: modern linguistic interpretations” In: Current issues of the humanities. Vol 27, No. 2, pp. 101-107. Available online. In: http://www.aphn-journal.in.ua/ archive/27_2020/part_2/16.pdf. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KRUIKEMEIER, Sanne. 2014. How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes. In: Computers in Human Behavior. Vol 34, pp. 131-139. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025. Date of consultation: 10/02/2020.
KRYVYI, Anatolii. 2001. Discourse analysis and modern linguistics. In the Discourse of Foreign Language Communication. LNU named after I. Franko. Lviv, Ukraine.
LECONTE, Cécile. 2010. Understanding euroscepticism. Red Globe Press. Macmillan. Available online. In: https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/ detail/Understanding-Euroscepticism/?K=9780230228078. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MASALOVA, Maria. 2021. “Rhetorical persuasive strategies in Joe Biden’s inaugural address: A critical discourse analysis” In: The Scientific Heritage. Vol 67, No. 4, pp. 65-70.
MASLOVA, Valentina A. 2008. Cognitive linguistics. Minsk: Tetra Systems. Available online. In: https://platona.net/load/knigi_ po_filosofii/kognitivnye_nauki/maslova_v_a_kognitivnaja_ lingvistika_2008/17-1-0-1466. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MASROOR, Farzana; KHAN, Qintarah. N; AIB, Iman; ALI, Zulfiqar. 2019. “Polarization and ideological weaving in Twitter discourse of politicians” In: Social media + Society. Vol 5, No. 4, pp. 1-4. Available online. In: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/. Date of consultation: 10/12/2020.
MORRIS, Stephen. 2001. Political correctness. In: Journal of Political Economy. Vol 109, No. 2, pp. 231-265. Available online. In: https://www.haverford.edu/sites/default/files/Morris2001.pdf. Date of consultation:10/12/2020.
MUSOLFF, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Available online. In: https://www.palgrave.com/gp/ book/9781403933898. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
OZADOVSKA, Liydmyla. 2004. “Language in the context of dialogue” In: Philosophical Thought. No. 3, pp. 22-50.
PAVLUTSKA, Vladyslava. 2008. “Political discourse: features and functions” In: Bulletin of ZhSU named after I. Franko. No. 39, pp. 218-221. Available online. In: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/2446/1/218-221.pdf. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
PROCTOR, Katarzyna; I-WENSU1, Lily. 2011. “The 1st person plural in political discourse – American politicians in interviews and in a debate” In: Journal of Pragmatics. Vol 43, No. 13, pp. 3251-3266. Available online. In: Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
PROTSENKO, Vitaly. November 11, 2018. “Anthology of populism: the real cause of people’s love and an effective weapon against Ukrainian populists” In: Voxukraine. Available online. In: https://voxukraine.org/ longreads/populism/index.html. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
RAHAYU, Ni Luh Putri; SUASTINI, Ni Wayan; JAYANTINI, I Gusti Agung Sri Rwa. 2021. “Political Discourse Structure on Joe Biden’s Acceptance Speech” In: International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics. Vol 1, No. 2, pp. 69-87.
REYES, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 22, No. 6, pp. 781-807. Available online. In: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.861.2997&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SARANI, Saeid; DEHSHIRI, Mohammad. 2019. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the American Dream and the China Dream” In: Amazonia Investiga. No. 8, Vol. 23, pp. 12-22. Available online. In: https:// amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/855. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SCHNEIKER, Andrea. 2019. “Telling the story of the superhero and the anti- politician as president: Donald Trump’s branding on Twitter” In: Political Studies Review. Vol 17, No. 3, pp. 210-223. Available online. In: https:// doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807712. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SERAZHIM, Kateryna. 2002. Discourse as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: methodology, architectonics, variability. Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. ISBN 966 -594-180-1. Available online. In: https://www.twirpx.com/file/242668/. Date of consultation: 14/09/2020.
SHARAPANOVSKA, Yuliia. 2016. “Theoretical foundations of political discourse analysis” In: Young Scholar. Vol. 4, No. 31, pp. 428-431.
SHCHOLOKOVA, Anna Vladimirovna. 2014. Features of the EU political discourse. Available online. In: https://bit.ly/3jCDuxe. Date of consultation: 14/07/2020.
SHEIGAL, Elena Iosifovna. 2000. “Semiotics of political discourse” In: Volgograd: Premena. Available online. In: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/2001-02-010-sheygal-e-i-semiotika-politicheskogo-diskursa- in-t-yazykoznaniya-ran-volgogr-gos-ped-un-t-volgograd-peremena- 2000-368-s-bibliogr-s. Date of consultation: 14/07/2020.
SHEIGAL, Elena Iosifovna. 2004. Semiotics of political discourse. Gnosis.Moscow, Russia.
SIREGAR, Try. 2021. “The critical discourse analysis on Joe Biden’s elected president speech” In: Journal of Applied Studies in Language. Vol 5, No. 1, pp. 79-86. Available online. In: http://ojs.pnb.ac.id/index.php/JASL/ article/download/2298/1747/. Date of consultation: 14/05/2021.
SLAVOVA, Liydmyla. 2012. Linguistic personality of the leader in the mirror of political linguistic personology: USA – Ukraine. Zhytomyr: ZhSU named after I. Franko. Kiev, Ukraine.
SMOLYAKOV, Vladimir Alexandrovich. 2010. “Political dimension of economic integration (comparison of European and East Asian models)” In: Bulletin of KSAEP. Vol 3, No. 48, pp. 23-35. Available online. In: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/politicheskoe-izmerenie-ekonomicheskoy- integratsii-sravnenie-evropeyskoy-i-vostochnoaziatskoy-modeley. Date of consultation: 14/05/2021.
STREZHNEVA, Marina Vadimovna. 2005. “Integration and engagement as tools for global governance” In: International Processes. Vol 3, No. 1, pp. 17-28. Available online. In: https://mgimo.ru/library/ publications/113529/. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1993. “Principles of critical discourse analysis” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 4, No. 2, pp. 249-283. Available online. In: https://doi.or g/10.1177/0957926593004002006. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1997. “What is political discourse analysis?” In: Belgian Journal of Linguistics. Vol 11, No. 1, pp. 11-52. Available online. In: https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 1998. “Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach” In: SAGE. Available online. In: https://sk.sagepub.com/books/ideology. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VAN DIJK, Teun, A. 2006a. “Discourse and manipulation” In: Discourse & Society. Vol 17, No. 2, pp. 359-383.
VAN DIJK, Teun. A. 2006b. “Politics, ideology, and discourse. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics” In: Elsevier. Available online. In: https:// doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00722-7. Date of consultation: 14/05/2020.
VASHCHUK, Tetiana. 2007. “Political discourse as an object of linguistic research” In: Bulletin of ZhSU named after I. Franko. No. 33, pp. 182- 185.
Publicado
2021-10-10
Cómo citar
Shkvorchenko, N., Cherniaieva, I., & Petlyuchenko, N. (2021). Linguistic approaches and modern communication technologies in political discourses in Europe and the USA (contrastive aspect). Cuestiones Políticas, 39(70), 815-831. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3970.49
Sección
Derecho Público
Copyright
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación donde se presenta el artículo, el cual se publica bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, que permite a otros compartir el trabajo previo el reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y de la publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
Esta obra está bajo la licencia:
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
