Fundamentos metodológicos para la evaluación de la transformación del ecosistema de la esfera social de Ucrania a partir de la arquitectura de la recuperación global

Palabras clave: ecosistema social, transformación digital, resiliencia institucional, transformaciones glocales, recuperación posconflicto, cohesión social

Resumen

El artículo examina la arquitectura del ecosistema del sector social en Ucrania con énfasis en las transformaciones glocales en el contexto de la recuperación posterior al conflicto. Está dedicado a los problemas más importantes para comprender la adaptabilidad de un sistema social, la transformación digital y la sostenibilidad institucional en condiciones de guerra. La metodología utiliza el innovador Índice Compuesto de Transformación Glocal (CIGT), que combina dimensiones estructurales, funcionales y adaptativas del análisis de los ecosistemas sociales. Se utilizó un enfo- que mixto, combinando métodos de investigación cuantitativos y cualitativos en todas las regiones de Ucrania. Los resultados muestran diferencias regionales significativas en la adaptación institucional y la transformación social. Las regiones occidentales demostraron la mayor plasticidad institucional y cohesión social, lo que se explica por el menor impacto directo de los conflictos militares y una infraestructura de sociedad civil desarrollada. La transformación digital ha puesto de manifiesto limitaciones sis- témicas caracterizadas por un acceso desigual a los servicios digitales, bajos niveles de alfabetización digital y barreras institucionales para su implementación. Se identificó la transformación digital y los aspectos sociales como factores clave en la sostenibilidad del sistema. Un aspecto único es el fenómeno de la cohesión social como el parámetro más estable de transformación, que es especialmente evidente durante los períodos de conflicto militar, cuando la sociedad ucraniana demuestra un alto potencial de adaptación y capacidad de autoorganización. Se proporciona un marco integral para comprender los conceptos arquitectónicos del ecosistema social, ofreciendo recomendaciones prácticas para la gobernanza social y estrategias de transformación sistemática en situaciones de posconflicto.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Iryna Verkhovod, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Economics. Associate Professor of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman. Associate Professor of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Halyna Lopushniak, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Economics. Professor of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Svitlana Bondarenko, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman. SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Economics. Professor of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman. SGH Warsaw School of Economics. Kyiv, Ukraine. 

Stanislav Bilohur, Higher Educational Institution “Interregional Academy of Personnel Management” Kremenchuk, Poltava Region, Ukraine.

PhD in Economics, in Economics, Lecturer, Department of Economic Design and Marketing. Prydniprovsky Institute of the Higher Educational Institution “Interregional Academy of Personnel Management” Kremenchuk, Poltava Region, Ukraine.

Ivan Ryabokon, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

PhD in Economics. Associate Professor of Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Citas

Allam, Z., Sharifi, A., Bibri, S.E., Jones, D.S., & Krogstie, J. (2022). The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures. Smart Cities, 5(3). 771-801. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040.

Barner, H., & Marom, N. (2024). Performing, co-producing and strategizing for a sustainable city: Urban sustainability policy in Tel Aviv, 2000-2020. Cities, 147, 104782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104782.

Bravaglieri, S., Åberg, H.E., Bertuca, A., & de Luca, C. (2025). Multi-actor rural innovation ecosystems: Definition, dynamics, and spatial relations. Journal of Rural Studies, 114, 103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103492.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Introduction. In Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (pp.1-7). Harvard University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78.4.

Decentralization Portal. URL: https://decentralization.ua/ (accessed 11/15/2024).

Decentralization Portal. (2024, November 19). How the Sumy Regional Development Agency transforms border challenges into opportunities for communities. Interview with Vitaliy Rastorhuiev: http://surl.li/ebmxfw.

Dmytrenko, M., Nesterenko, S., Oleksenko, R., Yeremenko, L., & Vasylchenko, O. (2021). Management of corporate responsibility in the business environment: Socio-psychological aspect. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2021, 9(4), 323-346. https://doi. org/10.21533/pen.v9i4.2312.

Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.

Holubchak, K.T., Sleptsov, O.S., & Tomlins, R. (2020). Architectural and City-Planning Aspects of Innovation Hubs Formation in the Context of Creative Urban Regeneration (On the Case of Ukrainian Cities). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 907(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/907/1/012014.

Howard AF, Lynch K, Thorne S, Hoiss S, Ahmad O, Arora RC, Currie LM, McDermid RC, Cloutier M, Crowe S, Rankin C, Erchov A, Hou B, Li H, Haljan G. (2024). Relationship between critical illness recovery and social determinants of health: a multiperspective qualitative study in British Columbia, Canada. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19; 14(11):e089086. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089086/.

Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as a driver for economic growth and social change Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004.

Kolot, A. M., & Herasymenko, O. O. (2022). New formats of labor organization: Nature, challenges, development trajectories. Economy of Ukraine, (5), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.05.059.

Kolot, A., Kozmenko, S., Herasymenko, O., & Štreimikienė. D. (2020) Development of a decent work institute as a social quality imperative: Lessons for Ukraine. Economics and Sociology, 13(2), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071789X.2020/13-2/5.

Kosheleva, T.N., Mordovets, V.A., & Novoselov, A.V. (2024). Formation of a Technological Model as an Information System Form of the Ecosystem. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 031-56380-5_27.

Larina, Y., Zelisko, I., Holitsyn, A., Yesmakhanova, A., & Nedopako, N. (2024). Financial aspects of digital marketing ecosystems formation in the sphere of information and communication technologies. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(56), 490-505. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.3.56.2024.4339.

LopezDeAsiain, M., Castro Bonaño, J.M., Borrallo-Jiménez, M. et al. (2024). Urban socio-ecosystem renewal: an ecosystem services assessment approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 2445-2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023- 05117-y.

Lopushniak, H., Verkhovod, I., Oleksenko, R., Vonberg, T. (2024). Assessment of the social protection system reform in the context of achieving the sustainable development goals. Interacción y perspectiva: Revista de Trabajo Social, 14(1), 26-42.

Mahbub, M. (2021). Blockchain Technologies for Securing IoT Infrastructure: IoT Block- chain Architectonics. In: Choudhury, T., Khanna, A., Toe, T.T., Khurana, M., Gia Nhu, N. (eds) Blockchain Applications in IoT Ecosystem. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 65691-1_13.

Martínez Montenegro, I. & Calderón Astete, R. (2024) “The plurality of the common and the imaginaries of property”, Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 14(2), pp. 364-388. https://doi. org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1753.

Martínez, F., Sepúlveda, B., & Manríquez, H. (2023). Fractal Organization of Chilean Cities: Observations from a Developing Country. Land, 12(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land12020296.

Mihr, A. (2021). “Glocal” Governance in the OSCE Region: A Research Proposal. In: Mihr, (eds) Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77489-9_16.

Ministry of Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine (MCTDU). (2024). Report on the results of Regional Development Agencies activities in 2023. URL: http://surl.li/kteqvs (accessed 15.11.2024).

Ng, W.-K., Yang, C.-M., & Chen, C.-L. (2024). Value Co-Creation on TV Talent Shows: Cases from Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19010014.

Novakovska, I., Medynska, N., Hunko, L., Skrypnyk, L., Samsonova, V., Shevchenko, N. (2025). Formation of the Economic Mechanism of Nature Management in the Conditions of New Global Environmental Architectonics. In: Alareeni, B., Elgedawy, I. (eds) Opportunities and Risks in AI for Business Development. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 546. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65207-3_28.

Pope, S., & Lim, A. (2020). The Governance Divide in Global Corporate Responsibility: The Global Structuring of Reporting and Certification Frameworks, 1998-2017. Organization Studies, 41(6), 821-854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619830131.

Pylypenko, V., Bondarenko, S., Kolisnichenko, R., Runcheva, N., Gorniak, K., & Drobotov, S. (2022). Information and analytical support threat monitoring and means of overcoming challenges to national security: international legal aspect. TRAMES, 26(76/71), 4, 373-395. https//doi.org/10.3176/tr.2022.4.02.

Razumkov Center (2024, October 15). Assessment of the situation in the country and government activities, trust in social institutions, politicians, officials and public figures, belief in victory (September 2024). https://razumkov.org.ua/. URL: http://surl.li/ydcwch (accessed 13.11.2024).

Robazza, G., Priego-Hernández, J., Caputo, S., & Melis, A. (2024). Temporary Urbanism as a Catalyst for Social Resilience: Insights from an Urban Living Lab Practice-Based Research. Buildings, 14(6), 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061513.

Shirish, A., Srivastava, S.C., Panteli, N., & O’Shanahan, J. (2025). A knowledgecentric model for government-orchestrated digital transformation among the microbusiness sector. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 34(1), 101870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101870.

Silva, M. L., Jacquinet, M. M., & Nobre, Â. L. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and management in a glocal context. In Research anthology on business law, policy, and social responsibility (Vol. 1-4, pp. 256-269). IGI Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2045-7.ch014.

Suntsova, O. (2024). Multilevel strategic planning for sustainable development in the global economy. Journal of European Economy, 23(4). 520-38, https://doi.org/10.35774/ jee2024.04.520.

Vasilyeva, O., Smith, D., & Lutscher, F. (2024). Evolution of dispersal in river networks. Bulletin of mathematical biology, 86(12), 140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01370-5.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VRU) (2019). Law of Ukraine “On Social Services”. URL: http:// surl.li/dmnscq (accessed 15.11.2024).

Zavhorodnii, A., Lagodiienko, V., Zerkina, O., Bondarenko, S., Danylyshyn, B., Kozachenko L. (2024). Selective Management in Sustainable Agri-Food Systems. TEM Journal, 13(4), 2931-2947. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM134-28.

Zenkienė, L., Leišytė, L. (2024). Strengthening university capacity in regional innovation ecosystem through the participation in the European Universities initiative. European Journal of Higher Education, 14(sup1), 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2024.2410358.

Zerkina, O., Nikishyna, O., Bondarenko, S., Makovoz, O., Durbalova, N. (2022). Institutional support for formation of reproductive logistics on the bread and bakery market of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(3), 153-177. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2022.08.03.08
Publicado
2025-08-22
Cómo citar
Verkhovod, I., Lopushniak, H., Bondarenko, S., Bilohur, S., & Ryabokon, I. (2025). Fundamentos metodológicos para la evaluación de la transformación del ecosistema de la esfera social de Ucrania a partir de la arquitectura de la recuperación global. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 15(3), 996-1019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16916397