Psychological well-being in students: Cultural adaptation and revision of the Ryff model

Keywords: Ryff Well-being model, Chinese International Students, psychometric property, psychological well-being, Self-acceptance

Abstract

This study presents a psychometric evaluation of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being (PWB) scale for Chinese international students from mainland China studying in Malaysia. With a sample of 335 participants, we implemented a comprehensive analytical approach incorporating Rasch analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to assess and refine the scale’s structure. Initial Rasch modeling in a pilot sample (N = 110) identified problematic items that exhibited measurement misfit. When applying CFA to test the original six-factor model in the main study, we discovered high interfactor correlations and inadequate discriminant validity, particularly among four dimensions. Through model respecification and validation, we developed a more parsimonious three-factor solution that consolidated Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Purpose in Life, and Self-Acceptance into a unified construct while retaining Autonomy and Positive Relations as distinct factors. The  optimized 15-item,  three-factor model  demonstrated excellent psychometric properties (χ²/df = 1.305, CFI = 0.995, TLI = 0.994, SRMR = 0.022, RMSEA = 0.030). These findings suggest that psychological well-being may manifest in a more integrated manner among Chinese international students from mainland China adapting to cross-cultural environments than originally theorized. This refined model offers researchers and practitioners a more culturally appropriate and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing psychological well-being in international student populations, while contributing to our understanding of how cultural context may influence the structural manifestation of psychological constructs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, R. A., Ploubidis, G. B., Huppert, F. A., Kuh, D., Wadsworth, M. E., & Croudace, T. J. (2006). Psychometric evaluation and predictive validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being items in a UK birth cohort sample of women. Health and quality of life outcomes, 4, 1-16.

Bannigan, K., & Watson, R. (2009). Reliability and validity in a nutshell. Journal of clinical nursing, 18(23), 3237-3243.

Bewick, B., Koutsopoulou, G., Miles, J., Slaa, E., & Barkham, M. (2010). Changes in un dergraduate students’ psychological well‐being as they progress through university. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903216643

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2013). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410614575

Boone, W. J., Townsend, J. S., & Staver, J. (2011). Using Rasch theory to guide the practice of survey development and survey data analysis in science education and to inform science reform efforts: An exemplar utilizing STEBI self‐efficacy data. Science Education, 95(2), 258-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20413

Bremner, R. H. (2011). Theories of happiness: On the origins of happiness and our contemporary conception (Doctoral dissertation, Universitätsund Landesbibliothek Bonn).

Briggs, D. C., & Wilson, M. (2003). An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models.

Burns, R. A., & Machin, M. A. (2009). Investigating the structural validity of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales across two samples. Social indicators research, 93, 359-375.

Burris, J. L., Brechting, E. H., Salsman, J., & Carlson, C. R. (2009). Factors associated with the psychological well-being and distress of university students. Journal of American College Health, 57(5), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.3200/jach.57.5.536-544

Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. routledge.

Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos, EQS, and Lisrel: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0101_4

Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos, EQS, and Lisrel: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86. https://doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0101_4

Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. (2005). Measuring psychological well-being in the Chi- nese. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(6), 1307-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. paid.2004.08.013

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.

Clarke, P. J., Marshall, V. W., Ryff, C. D., & Wheaton, B. (2001). Measuring psychological well-being in the Canadian study of health and aging. International psychogeriatrics, 13(S1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610202008013 [Opens in a new window]

Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist--Revised. Psychological assessment, 9(1), 3.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Dongqi, S., Prabakusuma, A. S., & Manystighosa, A. (2020). An empirical study on cross-cultural adaptation of Chinese overseas students in Malaysia: Survey of Chinese students at Segi University, Malaysia. Proceedings of the Brawijaya International Conference on Multidisciplinary Sciences and Technology (BICMST 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201021.032

Ederio, N. T., P. Inocian, E., I. Calaca, N., & M. Espiritu, J. G. (2023). Ethical research practices in educational institutions: A Literature Review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i5-02

Ederio, N. T., P. Inocian, E., I. Calaca, N., & M. Espiritu, J. G. (2023). Ethical research practices in educational institutions: A Literature Review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i5-02

Erikson, E. (1959). Theory of identity development. E. Erikson, Identity and the life cycle. Nueva York: International Universities Press. Obtenido de http://childdevpsychology. yolasite. com/resources/theory% 20of% 20ident ity% 20erikson.pdf.

Felzmann, H. (2009). Ethical issues in school-based research. Research Ethics, 5(3), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/174701610900500304

Felzmann, H. (2009). Ethical issues in school-based research. Research Ethics, 5(3), 104–109. https://doi-org.ezproxy.utm.my/10.1177/174701610900500304

Fernandes, H. M., Vasconcelos-Raposo, J., & Teixeira, C. M. (2010). Preliminary analysis of the psychometric properties of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being in Portuguese adolescents. the Spanish Journal of psychology, 13(2), 1032-1043.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.

Frances, M. Y., & Solon, T. K. (2014). Item response theory for measurement validity. Shanghai archives of Psychiatry, 26(3), 171. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.03.010

Gan, G. G., & Yuen Ling, H. (2019). Anxiety, depression and quality of life of medical students in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia, 74(1), 57-61.

Gould, A. (1994). The issue of measurement validity in health-care research. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 1(2), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjtr.1994.1.2.99

Gustems-Carnicer, Jose, Calderón, C., & Calderón-Garrido, D. (2019). Stress, coping strategies and academic achievement in teacher education students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1576629

Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International encyclopedia of statistical science, 904-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395

Hair, J.F.J., Black, W. C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2019). Multivariate Data

Haji-Othman, Y., & Yusuff, M. S. S. (2022). Assessing reliability and validity of attitude construct using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci, 12(5), 378-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i5/13289

Henn, C. M., Hill, C., & Jorgensen, L. I. (2016). An investigation into the factor structure of the Ryff Scales of Psychological Well-Being. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 42(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1275

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.

Huppert, F. A. (2009). Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied psychology: health and well‐being, 1(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01008.x

Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of happiness studies, 15, 1425-1456.

Jager, J., Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2017). II. More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the society for research in child development, 82(2), 13-30. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mono.v82.2/issuetoc

Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/11258-000


Jung, C. G. (2001). Modern Man in Search of a Soul. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059479

Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well- being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57, 171-190.

Kafka, G. J., & Kozma, A. (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well- being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57, 171-190.

Kállay, É., & Rus, C. (2014). Psychometric properties of the 44-item version of Ryff’s Psy- chological Well-Being Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000163

Keyes, C. L. (2002). The Mental Health Continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090197

Kitamura, T., Kishida, Y., Gatayama, R., Matsuoka, T., Miura, S., & Yamabe, K. (2004). Ryff’s psychological well-being inventory: factorial structure and life history correlates among Japanese university students. Psychological Reports, 94(1), 83-103. https://doi-org.ezproxy.utm.my/10.2466/pr0.94.1.83-103

Koyuncu, M. S., & Şata, M. (2023). Using ACER ConQuest program to examine multidimensional and many-facet models. International journal of assessment tools in education, 10(2), 279-302.

Lee, T. S. H., Sun, H. F., & Chiang, H. H. (2019). Development and validation of the short- form Ryff’s psychological well-being scale for clinical nurses in Taiwan. Journal of Medical Sciences, 39(4), 157-162.

Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-based dentistry, 7(1), 24-25.

Linacre, J. M. (1999). Understanding Rasch measurement: estimation methods for Rasch measures. Journal of outcome measurement, 3, 382-405.

Lindfors, P., Berntsson, L., & Lundberg, U. (2006). Factor structure of Ryff’s psychological well-being scales in Swedish female and male white-collar workers. Personality and individual differences, 40(6), 1213-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.016

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Investing and developing positive organizational behavior. Positive Organizational Behavior, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212752.n2

Ma, L. (2022). An Introduction to The Acer Conquest Software for Item Response Analyses. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences, 3(2), 47-61.

Mahalanobis, P. C. (2018). On the generalized distance in statistics. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (2008), 80, S1-S7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48723335

Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746

Nemati, S., Gargari, R. B., Vahedi, S., & Mirkazempour, M. H. (2023). Mindfulness-based resilience training on the psychological well-being of medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and Development in Medical Education, 12(1), 1-1. https://doi. org/10.34172/rdme.2023.33099

Neugarten, B. L. (1973). Personality change in late life: A developmental perspective. The Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, 311–335. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10044-012

Pedaprolu, R., Yashavanth, B. S., & Rao, R. V. S. (2021). Personality and Well-Being Traits of Agricultural Scientists: Assessment, Correlations, and Prediction. Journal of Organisation & Human Behaviour, 10(3), 9-21.

Reuning, K., & Plutzer, E. (2020, September). Valid vs. invalid straightlining: The complex relationship between straightlining and data quality. In Survey Research Methods (Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 439-459). https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2020.v14i5.7641

Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045357

Rui, Z., & Wahab, N. A. (2022). The Challenges and Academic Adaptations among Ningxia China Students Studying in Malaysia. Sciences, 12(4), 1302-1313.

Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Rafanelli, C., Ryff, C., & Fava, G. A. (2003). La validazione italiana delle Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB). Rivista di psichiatria.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.69.4.719

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.

Sefidi, F. A. T. E. M. E. H., & Farzad, V. (2012). Validated measure of Ryff psychological well- being among students of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (2009). Journal of Inflammatory Diseases, 16(1), 65-71.

Shafaei, A., Abd Razak, N., & Nejati, M. (2016). Integrating two cultures successfully: Factors influencing acculturation attitude of international postgraduate students in Malaysia. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(2), 137–154. https://doi. org/10.1177/1475240916653566

Sil, A., & Das, N. (2017). Informed consent process: Foundation of the researcher–participant bond. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 62(4), 380. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_272_17

Sirigatti, S., Stefanile, C., Giannetti, E., Iani, L., Penzo, I., & Mazzeschi, A. (2009). Assessment of factor structure of Ryff’s Psychological Well-Being Scales in Italian adolescents. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 259(56), 30-50.

Sng, B., Yip, C., & Han, N. L. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 684. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190627

Sondergeld, T. A., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Using Rasch measurement for the development and use of affective assessments in science education research. Science Education, 98(4), 581- 613. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21118

Springer, K. W., & Hauser, R. M. (2006). An assessment of the construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being: Method, mode, and measurement effects. Social science research, 35(4), 1080-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.07.004

Van Dierendonck, D. (2004). The construct validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well- being and its extension with spiritual well-being. Personality and individual differences, 36(3), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3

Van Dierendonck, D., Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., & Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2008). Ryff’s six-factor model of psychological well-being, a Spanish exploration. Social Indicators Research, 87, 473-479.

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70. https://doi-org.ezproxy.utm.my/10.1177/109442810031002

Villar, F., Triadó, C., Celdrán, M., & Solé, C. (2010). Measuring well-being among Spanish older adults: Development of a simplified version of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being. Psychological Reports, 107(1), 265-280. https://doi-org.ezproxy.utm.my/10.2466/02.07.08.10.21.PR0.107.4.265-28

Voitenko, E. (2022). Occupational Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis of the Main Structural Models. International Journal of Behavior Studies in Organizations, 7, 30-39. https://doi. org/10.32038/JBSO.2022.07.03

Whittaker, T. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (2022). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.

Wright, B., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Measurement and Statistics.

Zhou, Y., Jindal-Snape, D., Topping, K., & Todman, J. (2008). Theoretical models of culture shock and adaptation in international students in higher education. Studies in higher education, 33(1), 63-75. https://doi-org.ezproxy.utm.my/10.1080/03075070701794833
Published
2025-08-21
How to Cite
Xu, M., Jaffri, H. B., Yang, X., Chor, S. L., & Ma, X. (2025). Psychological well-being in students: Cultural adaptation and revision of the Ryff model. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 15(3), 879-900. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16915750