The clinical paradigma in Social Work: beyond case management, therapeutic intervention and its delimitation from Psychology
Abstract
This article discusses the nature of Clinical Social Work (CSW) and its intersection with psychology. It analyzes the identity of the social worker as a therapist, grounded in the ecology of the individual and the family system. By reviewing the contributions of figures such as Virginia Satir and Michael White, it is established that CSW does not represent an intrusion into psychology but rather a discipline with its own epistemology centered on the “subject-in-situation.” The Venezuelan legal framework is examined, and a demarcation is proposed based on the focus of intervention: relational distress versus intrapsychic disorder.
Downloads
References
De Shazer, S. & Berg, I. K. (1997). Entrevistar para soluciones. Paidós.
Foucault, M. (1975). Vigilar y Castigar: Nacimiento de la prisión. Siglo XXI.
Foucault, M. (1964). Historia de la locura en la época clásica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Golan, N. (1978). Treatment Methods in Adult Transitions. Free Press.
Hearn, G. (1958). Theory Building in Social Work. University of Toronto Press.
Ituarte, A. (1992). Procedimiento y Proceso en Trabajo Social Clínico. Siglo XXI.
Ley de Ejercicio del Trabajo Social. Gaceta Oficial de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela N° 38.930 del 14 de mayo de 2008.
Rapoport, L. (1970). Crisis Intervention as a Mode of Brief Treatment. University of Chicago Press.
Richmond, M. (1917). Social Diagnosis. Russell Sage Foundation.
Satir, V. (1991). The New Peoplemaking. Science and Behavior Books.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. Norton.















