The philosophy of social justice in the work of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum: Ethical and legal aspects

Keywords: critical thinking, social justice, human capabilities approach, Amartya Sen, Martha Nussbaum

Abstract

In the fields of critical thinking and contemporary social theory, social justice, in philosophical terms, has established itself as an analytical category with clear emancipatory nuances, which seeks to question how a given community distributes valuable goods, burdens, opportunities, and symbolic recognition among its members, paying particular attention to those most disadvantaged in asymmetrical power relations. The research carried out in this article aimed to interpret the ethical and legal foundations of the philosophy of social justice in the works of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. To achieve this objective, documentary analysis and the comparative method were used. In the conclusions, the results obtained suggest that the human capabilities approach can benefit 21st-century societies, as it challenges simple solutions in the face of an increasingly conflictive and unequal world. Therefore, it is suggested that development should be assessed not only through the accumulation of wealth or technological complexity (deterministic economism), but also through everyone’s true capacity to live in substantive dignity, in a context of freedom, security, and social recognition, above poverty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Educational Research Association. (02 de marzo de 2025). An Introduction to Documentary Research. https://www.aera.net/SIG013/Research-Connections/Introduction-to-Documentary-Research

Aranda, M., Martínez, M. d., & Camacho, A. (2024). Análisis documental, un proceso de apropiación del conocimiento. Revista Digital Universitaria, 25(6), 1-11. https://www.revista.unam.mx/wp-content/uploads/v25_n6_a1.pdf

Asamblea general de las naciones. (1948). Declaración Universal de Derechos Humanos. Nueva York: ONU.

Citlaly, A. R. (2024). La justicia social un acceso para el bien común. Biolex. Revista Jurídica del Departamento de Derecho, 16(27), 1-16. https://biolex.unison.mx/index.php/biolex_unison_mx/article/view/332/374

Colmenarejo, R. (2016). Enfoque de capacidades y sostenibilidad Aportaciones de Amartya Sen y Martha Nussbaum. Ideas y Valores, LXV(160), 121-149. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/809/80944720006.pdf

Eslava, A. (2010). La idea de la justicia al servicio del desarrollo en Amartya Sen. Co-herencia, 7(13), 245-260. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/774/77416997010.pdf

Hovey, R. B., Vigouroux, M., Noushi, N., Pavate, V., & Amja, K. (2022). Applied Philosophical Hermeneutic Research: the unmethod. International Journal of Qualitative Methods(21), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221101237

Mondragón, R. (2023). El enfoque de las capacidades de Nussbaum. Algunos rasgos y debates. Andamios, 20(52), 199-228. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/anda/v20n52/2594-1917-anda-20-52-199.pdf

Murillo, F., & Hernández, R. (2011). Hacia un Concepto de Justicia Social. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 9(4), 7-23. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/551/55122156002.pdf

Nohlen, D. (2018). El método comparativo. México DF: UNAM.

Nussbaum, M. (2007). Las fronteras de la justicia: Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Madrid: Ediciones Paidós Ibérica.

Nussbaum, M. (2012). Crear capacidades Propuesta para el desarrollo humano. Barcelona: Paidós.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2016). Educación para el lucro, educación para la libertad. Nómadas, (44), 13-25. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1051/105146818002.pdf

Piovani, J., & Krawczyk, N. (2017). Los Estudios Comparativos: algunas notas históricas, epistemológicas y metodológicas. Educação & Realidade, Porto Alegre, 42 (03), 821-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2175-623667609

Pitasse, K. (2024). Poverty as capability deprivation: Considering the relational approach, group-based analysis, and socio-structural lens. European Journal of Social Theory, 28(2), 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310241270471

Rawls, J. (1971). Teoría de la Justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y libertad. Planeta. https://indigenasdelperu.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/desarrollo_y_libertad_-_amartya_sen.pdf

Sen, A. (12 de abril de 2002). Desigualdad de género La Misoginia como Problema de Salud Pública. Letras Libres: https://letraslibres.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/pdf_art_7404_6477.pdf

Sen, A. (2009). La idea de la Justicia. México DF: Taurus.

Stewart, F. (12 de marzo de 2013). Capabilities and Human Development: Beyond the individual—the critical role of social institutions and social competencies. United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/hdro1303stewart.pdf

Urquijo, M. J. (2014). La teoría de las capacidades en Amartya Sen. Edetania (46), 63-80. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5010857
Published
2026-03-27
How to Cite
Oleksenko, R., Fabryka, A., Ryk, S., Kravchenko, O., & Levchenko, L. (2026). The philosophy of social justice in the work of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum: Ethical and legal aspects. Interacción Y Perspectiva, 16(2), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19243238